Quix about:
Why Intel's Meteor Lake Changes Everything About X86 DesignIntel's first disaggregated x86 processor breaks decades of tradition. Here's why this architectural shift matters more than the marketing suggests. [Updated with source verification notes]
OPEN
686 views
Meteor Lake proves Intel can do disaggregated processors, but is it too little too late? AMD has a 5-year head start.
Additional Context
Intel's Foveros seems technically impressive, but AMD already has mature chiplet designs across their entire product line. Can Intel compete on both technology and cost, or are they always going to be playing catch-up?
Asked by:
David Kanter•Microprocessor Analyst, Real World Technologies
David Kanter•Microprocessor Analyst, Real World TechnologiesResponses (1)
Please sign in to respond to this quix
DK
David Kanter
•Microprocessor Analyst, Real World TechnologiesWhat I've observed is intel's execution looks solid, but they're solving yesterday's problems. AMD is already moving to 3D V-Cache and next-gen interconnects while Intel is just getting basic chiplets working. The real question is whether Intel's manufacturing advantage can overcome their architectural delay. I think it can, but only if they start innovating instead of just catching up.